Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Ç ¿ÏÀü ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ¹× ÇÏ¾Ç ºÎºÐ ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁöÇü °íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶¹°À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Àü¾Ç ¼öº¹Áõ·Ê º¸°í

Full-mouth rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed dental prostheses for the edentulous maxilla and partially edentulous mandible: A case report

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 57±Ç 4È£ p.374 ~ 381
±èÅÂÇü, ¿À°æö, ¹®È«¼®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÅÂÇü ( Kim Tae-Hyung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¿À°æö ( Oh Kyung-Chul ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹®È«¼® ( Moon Hong-Seok ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

³ÐÀº ¿µ¿ªÀÇ ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ºÎÀ§¸¦ ¼öº¹Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀº ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸, ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ È°¿ëÇÒ °æ¿ì º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤°ú À¯Áö, ±×¸®°í ÁöÁöÀÇ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ´õ À¯¸®Çϸç, ÀúÀÛÈ¿À²ÀÌ Çâ»óµÇ´Â µî ±â´ÉÀûÀ¸·Î ´õ ¾çÈ£ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ °°Àº ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á¹æ¹ýÀº Å©°Ô °¡Ã¶¼º°ú °íÁ¤¼º ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, Ä¡Á¶°ñÀÇ Èí¼öÁ¤µµ, ¾Ç°£°ü°è, ȯÀÚÀÇ ¼±È£µµ, »çȸ¡¤°æÁ¦Àû ¿äÀÎ µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿© ÀûÀýÇÑ Á¢±Ù ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÇÑÆí, Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆÀÇ ¹°¼ºÀÌ Å©°Ô °³¼±µÊ¿¡ µû¶ó, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁöÇü °íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ Àç·á·Î¼­ ´ÜÀϱ¸Á¶ Áö¸£ÄڴϾư¡ °¢±¤À» ¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ´ÜÀϱ¸Á¶ Áö¸£ÄڴϾƴ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Äھ ¼¼¶ó¹ÍÀ» ºñ´Ï¾î¸µ ÇÑ º¸Ã¶¹°À̳ª ±Ý¼Ó µµÀç°üº¸´Ù ÆÄÀý°ú chippingÀÇ ºóµµ°¡ ÀûÀ¸¸ç Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ÀÚü°¡ ÃæºÐÇÑ µÎ²²¸¦ °¡Áú ¼ö ÀÖ¾î ±¸Á¶ÀûÀ¸·Î ÁÁÀº ¹°¼ºÀ» Áö´Ò ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÃÖ±Ù¿¡´Â Åõ¸íµµ°¡ ÁõÁøµÈ ´ÜÀϱ¸Á¶ Áö¸£ÄڴϾƵµ Ãâ½ÃµÇ¾î, ÀüÄ¡ºÎ º¸Ã¶¹°À» À§ÇÑ Àç·á·Îµµ ³Î¸® »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» Áõ·ÊÀÇ ³²È¯Àº »ó¾Ç ¾çÃø ±¸Ä¡ºÎÀÇ °á¼Õ ¹× ´Ù¼ö ÀÜÁ¸Ä¡ÀÇ Áߵ ÀÌ»óÀÇ Àü¹ÝÀû ¸¸¼º Ä¡ÁÖ¿° ÀÌȯÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ, ÇÏ¾Ç ¾çÃø °ßÄ¡ ¹× ÁÂÃø Á¦1, 2 ¼Ò±¸Ä¡¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç Ä¡¾Æ¸¦ ¹ßÄ¡ÇÑ ÈÄ, »ó¾Ç 8°³ ¹× ÇÏ¾Ç 3°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³À» µ¿¹ÝÇÑ Àü¾Ç ¼öº¹ Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. º¸Ã¶¹° ÀåÂø ÈÄ 1³â °£ÀÇ °æ°ú °üÂû ±â°£ µ¿¾È ±â´ÉÀû, ½É¹ÌÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·ÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾î À̸¦ º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.

A conventional approach for the treatment of long-span edentulous areas is the use of removable dentures. However, placing implants in these areas results in superior functional outcomes by increasing the stability, support, and resistance of the prostheses and improving the masticatory efficiency. Treatment modalities utilizing implants can be further classified into either removable or fixed-type prostheses. Several factors such as the amount of alveolar bone resorption, inter-arch relationship, patient preferences, and socioeconomic status should be considered when determining the appropriate treatment approach. Monolithic zirconia has been considered a suitable material for implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis, because of the drastic improvement in its mechanical properties. It exhibits fewer incidences of fracture and chipping of the prostheses, and has greater bulk of material than metal-ceramic crowns and zirconia-veneered ceramics. Moreover, highly translucent monolithic zirconia is also available in the market, and its application is gradually increasing for anterior tooth rehabilitation. The present report describes a patient who underwent full-mouth rehabilitation with fixed dental prostheses (eight upper and three lower implant placements). All teeth, except bilateral mandibular canines and left mandibular first and second premolars, were extracted after the diagnosis of generalized chronic moderate-to-advanced periodontitis of the remaining teeth. The patient reported satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes during the one-year follow-up visit.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁöÁöÇü °íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶¹°; ´ÜÀϱ¸Á¶ Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ; Àü¾Ç ¼öº¹
Implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis; Monolithic zirconia; Full-mouth rehabilitation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed